On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, HOT-cleanup should stop the bloat increase once the snapshot
> crosses the old_snapshot_threshold without even needing to wait until
> the next autovac runs.
> Does the code intentionally only work for manual vacuums?  If so, that
> seems quite surprising.  Or perhaps I am missing something else here.

What proportion of the statements in your simulated workload were
updates? Per my last mail to this thread, I'm interested in knowing if
this was a delete heavy workload.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to