On 2016-04-05 18:10:11 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > I'd prefer to see this as a lock wait mode where it sits in the normal lock > queue BUT other lock requestors are allowed to queue jump past it. That > should be just a few lines changed in the lock conflict checker and some > sleight of hand in the lock queue code.
+1, although wading into deadlock.c makes one need a shower. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers