On 2016-04-05 18:10:11 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'd prefer to see this as a lock wait mode where it sits in the normal lock
> queue BUT other lock requestors are allowed to queue jump past it. That
> should be just a few lines changed in the lock conflict checker and some
> sleight of hand in the lock queue code.
+1, although wading into deadlock.c makes one need a shower.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: