* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> broken that way as rowsecurity.sql, which is (still) creating roles
> >> named "alice" and "bob", but it's not acceptable like this.
> > Attached is a patch to fix all of the role usage in rowsecurity.sql
> > (I believe, feel free to let me know if there's anything else).  In
> > particular, all of the roles are changed to begin with 'regress_', and
> > they are all now created with NOLOGIN.
> +1 for the general idea, although there's something to be said for
> using names like 'regress_alice' and 'regress_bob' in this context.
> 'regress_user1' and 'regress_user2' are awfully gray and same-y,
> and therefore a bit error-prone IMO.

Fair enough.

I'll adjust the ending '_userX' to be actual names along the lines of
'alice', 'bob', 'carol', 'dave', 'eve', 'frank', etc.

(List pulled from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob).



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to