On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Alexander Korotkov
>> So, for read-only benchmark this patch introduces more than 5 times
>> regression on big machine.
> I did not schedule a saturation test on a big machine. I guess I
> should have done.
I have booked two large NUMA machines for Friday to look for any
remaining performance regressions on high-concurrency loads on such
machines. Anyone with ideas on particular tests that they feel
should be included, please let me know before then.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: