On 2016-04-13 11:20:19 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-04-13 14:16:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Good point, it would be absolutely duplicative.  What I'd suggest,
> > actually, is that we convert this to the same info as what elog
> > provides (file+line+function name).
> Heh, I was wondering the same aftering sending the last email.  Will do
> that then.

Pushed. Let's see what pademelon says...

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to