On 2016-04-18 20:43:30 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yeah, introducing a new WAL record to address this issue in
> back-branches would not be an issue, and that's what we should do. For
> HEAD, let's add that in the commit record.

I'm not sure why/how you'd do it that way in HEAD? I mean the only
reason not to use a separate record is the standby incompatibility.

- Andres

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to