On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Josh berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > We should send the owner of the scariest patch something as a prize. > Maybe a plastic skeleton or something ...
I think it was a good idea to call it the scariest patch rather than something more severe sounding. Having the poll only be half-serious is a good way to avoid self-censorship, and emphasizes that we're concerned about bugs that cause serious instability to the system as a whole. We're less concerned about the overall number of bugs in any given patch. I would have appreciated more scope to say how confident I am in my prediction, and how scary in absolute terms I consider the scariest patches to be. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
