On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:02:28PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:50:18PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I'll be doing more testing, review and clean-up (there are some > > whitespace only changes in the later patches that really should be > > included in the earlier patches where the code was actually changed) > > tonight with plans to push this tomorrow night.
> (2) pg_dump queries: > > > @@ -14187,18 +14869,65 @@ dumpTable(Archive *fout, TableInfo *tbinfo) > > > + "FROM > > pg_catalog.pg_attribute at " > > + "JOIN pg_catalog.pg_class c ON > > (at.attrelid = c.oid) " > > + "LEFT JOIN > > pg_init_privs pip ON " > > Since pg_attribute and pg_class require schema qualification here, so does > pg_init_privs. Likewise elsewhere in the patch's pg_dump changes. > > > (3) pg_dumpall became much slower around the time of these commits. On one > machine (POWER7 3.55 GHz), a pg_dumpall just after initdb slowed from 0.25s at > commit 6c268df^ to 4.0s at commit 7a54270. On a slower machine (Opteron > 1210), pg_dumpall now takes 19s against such a fresh cluster. [This is a generic notification.] The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen, since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open item. If that responsibility lies elsewhere, please let us know whose responsibility it is to fix this. Since new open items may be discovered at any time and I want to plan to have them all fixed well in advance of the ship date, I will appreciate your efforts toward speedy resolution. Please present, within 72 hours, a plan to fix the defect within seven days of this message. Thanks. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers