On 04/25/2016 03:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm going to go ahead and push this, because it seems clearly more robust > than what we have. But I'd appreciate a report on whether it fixes your > issue.
6b1a213bbd6599228b2b67f7552ff7cc378797bf did not fix it. Attached is the assembler output (-O0) from float.c as of that commit.
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers