Hello,
At Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:17:13 -0700, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote in
<20160426001713.hbqdiwvf4mkzk...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> Hi,
>
> for performance reasons it's a good idea to use the binary protocol. But
> doing so between two postgres installations is made unnecessarily hard
> by the choice of embedding and verifying oids in composite and array
> types. When using extensions, even commonly used ones like hstore, the
> datatype oids will often not be the same between systems, even when
> using exactly the same version on the same OS.
>
> Specifically I'm talking about
>
> Datum
> array_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> {
> ...
> element_type = pq_getmsgint(buf, sizeof(Oid));
> if (element_type != spec_element_type)
> {
> /* XXX Can we allow taking the input element type in any cases?
> */
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_DATATYPE_MISMATCH),
> errmsg("wrong element type")));
> }
> ...
> }
>
> and
>
> Datum
> record_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> {
> ...
> /* Process each column */
> for (i = 0; i < ncolumns; i++)
> ...
> /* Verify column datatype */
> coltypoid = pq_getmsgint(buf, sizeof(Oid));
> if (coltypoid != column_type)
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_DATATYPE_MISMATCH),
> errmsg("wrong data type: %u, expected
> %u",
> coltypoid,
> column_type)));
> ...
> }
>
>
> given that we're giving up quite some speed and adding complexity to
> make send/recv functions portable, this seems like a shame.
>
> I'm failing to see what these checks are buying us? I mean the text
> representation of a composite doesn't include type information about
> contained columns either, I don't see why the binary version has to?
>
> I'm basically thinking that we should remove the checks on the receiving
> side, but leave the sending of oids in place for backward compat.
FWIW, I think that typsend/typreceive are intended for the use by
COPY FROM/TO and the doc says that the following.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-copy.html
> Binary Format
>
> The binary format option causes all data to be stored/read as
> binary format rather than as text. It is somewhat faster than the
> text and CSV formats, but a binary-format file is less portable
> across machine architectures and PostgreSQL versions. Also, the
> binary format is very data type specific; for example it will not
> work to output binary data from a smallint column and read it
> into an integer column, even though that would work fine in text
> format.
I haven't considered much about the usefulness of this
restriction, but receiving into an array of a different type
easily leads to a crash.
# However, false matching of type oids also would do so.
I suppose that we should reconsider here if removing the checks.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
