Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Now, if VS2015 actually has broken bool-returning V0, the argument for
>> keeping it going becomes a lot weaker. But at this point I suspect
>> strongly that that's not what happened but rather we've got a faulty
>> bool cast there, which if true is something we need to fix regardless
>> of any considerations about V0. Would someone please try the experiment
>> requested upthread?
> I just gave it a try. And by using PG_1_BYTE() the tests of
> contrib/seg/ are passing.
Thanks! Barring objections, I will revert c8e81afc60093b19 tomorrow
and instead fix DatumGetBool.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
