Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
NO. We don't even have a patch for this, much less one that's been
through any review. This suggestion is at least two months too late.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
