On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:57:19PM -0300, Marcelo Zabani wrote: > > Hi, Tom, > > > > You're right, I don't think one can argue that the default parser should > know > > HTML. > > How about your suggestion of there being an HTML parser, is it feasible? > I ask > > this because I think that a lot of people store HTML documents these > days, and > > although there probably aren't lots of HTML with words written along > multiple > > inline elements, it would certainly be nice to have a proper parser for > these > > use cases. > > > > What do you think? > > It sounds useful. > It sounds like an external project/extension... David J.
