Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On 04/27/2016 11:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, git_changelog can merge identically-messaged commits despite
>> intervening commits. It's set up to not merge commits more than 24 hours
>> apart, though. We could loosen that requirement but I'm afraid it would
>> make things confusing to merge far-apart commits.
> ISTM that git_changelog should be looking at the AuthorDate instead of
> the CommitDate. Then it would work correctly for backpatches done using
> cherry-pick.
Meh. That would also make it noticeably *less* accurate for some other
scenarios. It actually did look at AuthorDate to start with, and we
changed it because we didn't like the results; cf 7299778a9.
Also, IME, backpatching with cherry-pick fails often enough that designing
one's process around it is just asking for pain. Certainly, many fewer
than half of my own back-patches manage to use cherry-pick.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
