* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > More generally, though, I wonder how we can have some test coverage > > on such cases going forward. Is the patch below too ugly to commit > > permanently, and if so, what other idea can you suggest? > > I suggest a buildfarm animal running a custom buildfarm module that > exercises the pg_upgrade test from every supported version to the latest > stable and to master -- together with your proposed case that leaves a > toastless table around for pg_upgrade to handle.
That would help greatly with pg_dump test coverage as well.. One of the problems of trying to get good LOC coverage of pg_dump is that a *lot* of the code is version-specific... Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature