On May 11, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
Advertising
> I'm not clear enough on your intended usage to know whether these
> operators are a good fit, but they are sitting there waiting to be
> used if they do fit.
Huh. I haven’t had any problems with IS DISTINCT FROM for rows, except for the
situation in which a failure is thrown because the types vary, say between TEXT
and CITEXT. That can drive the tester crazy, since it says something like:
Results differ beginning at row 3:
have: (44,Anna)
want: (44,Anna)
But overall I think that’s okay; the tester really does want to make sure the
type is correct.
Thanks,
David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
