On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> writes: >> I think moving to a two-number format is a mistake: what exactly will >> PQserverVersion() return in that case? > > For, say, 10.2 it would be 100002, equivalent to 10.0.2 under old style. > > We could redefine it as being major plus four-digit minor, really. > Under the current maintenance scheme we never get anywhere near minor > release 99 before a branch dies ... but having some more breathing room > there would not be a bad thing.
Perhaps that would be a good topic for the developer meeting in Ottawa? That's just in two days, so it looks like a good timing. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers