On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Since we were considering a new VACUUM option, surely this is serious
> enough to warrant more than just contrib.

I would like to see us consider the long-term best place for amcheck's
functionality at the same time. Ideally, verification would be a
somewhat generic operation, with AM-specific code invoked as

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to