On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Agreed -- things like pglogical and BDR rely on background workers to do
> their jobs.  Many other users of bgworkers have popped up, so I think
> it'd be a bad idea if parallel queries are able to monopolize all the
> available slots.

That never occurred to me. I'd say it could be a serious problem, that
should be fixed promptly.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to