Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD > >> and back-branches? > > > > Sounds sensible to me. > > I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch > PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some > extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master.
I wonder why is that -- just to reduce the commit load? I don't think this kind of change is likely to break anything, is it? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers