While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed
that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been
convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further
investigation showed that while 380 of the built-in operators had
negators, 395 do not.
For some fraction I'll investigate if warranted, a negator makes no
sense. For the rest, I'd like to propose adding negator operators
prefixed with '!', just as we have for the negators of regex-like
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: