Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Hmm, so we could solve the complaint by adding an ANALYZE. I'm open to
>>> that; other opinions?
>> We could just enforce work_mem to 64kB and then reset it.
> Or just set up work_mem to a wanted value for the duration of the run
> of psql_crosstab. Attached is my proposal.
I liked the ANALYZE idea better; this seems pretty ad-hoc.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
