On 2016-06-10 09:41:09 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2016-06-10 09:34:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> > On 2016-06-09 14:37:31 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> >> I'm writing a patch right now, planning to post it later today, commit > >> >> it tomorrow. > >> > > >> > Attached. > >> > >> - /* see bufmgr.h: OS dependent default */ > >> - DEFAULT_BACKEND_FLUSH_AFTER, 0, WRITEBACK_MAX_PENDING_FLUSHES, > >> + 0, 0, WRITEBACK_MAX_PENDING_FLUSHES, > >> Wouldn't it be better to still use LT_BACKEND_FLUSH_AFTER here, and > >> just enforce it to 0 for all the OSes at the top of bufmgr.h? > > > > What would be the point? The only reason for DEFAULT_BACKEND_FLUSH_AFTER > > was that it differed between operating systems. Now it doesn't anymore. > > Then why do you keep it defined?
Ooops. Missing git add. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers