"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's a question then - what is the _drawback_ to having 1024 wal_buffers > as opposed to 8?
Waste of RAM? You'd be better off leaving that 8 meg available for use
as general-purpose buffers ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
