Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > I think we should break up internal into various kinds of internal > > depending on what kind of a thing we've actually got a pointer to. > > Not a bad long-term project, but it's not happening in this cycle. > I'm not very sure how we'd go about it anyway --- for examples > like this, every new user-defined aggregate potentially wants its > own flavor of "internal", so how do we manage that?
Can't we have them be ExtensibleNode? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
