Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What seems like a more conservative answer to me is to revert c869a7d5b
>> in 9.1 only, and address the buildfarm stability issue it sought to
>> resolve by increasing the fixed timeout from 5 seconds to, say, 10.

> +1 for doing that. Knowing that silent_mode will be out of community
> support scope in a couple of months, that's the right answer to this
> bug call.

Done that way.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to