On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 18 June 2016 at 11:28, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
>> Several times now when reading, debugging and writing code I've wished
>> that LWLockHeldByMe assertions specified the expected mode, especially
>> where exclusive locking is required.
>> What do you think about something like the attached?  See also an
>> example of use.  I will add this to the next commitfest.
> I've wanted this before too, and was surprised it wasn't present. TBH I
> assumed there was a technical reason it wasn't and didn't investigate
> further because I just assumed it'd have been added with the original
> LWLockHeldByMe if it were simple.

Before ab5194e6f (25 December 2014) held_lwlocks didn't record the mode.

Thomas Munro

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to