On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 18 June 2016 at 11:28, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: >> Several times now when reading, debugging and writing code I've wished >> that LWLockHeldByMe assertions specified the expected mode, especially >> where exclusive locking is required. >> >> What do you think about something like the attached? See also an >> example of use. I will add this to the next commitfest. > > I've wanted this before too, and was surprised it wasn't present. TBH I > assumed there was a technical reason it wasn't and didn't investigate > further because I just assumed it'd have been added with the original > LWLockHeldByMe if it were simple.
Before ab5194e6f (25 December 2014) held_lwlocks didn't record the mode. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
