On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, David G. Johnston > <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 10.x is the desired output. > > 10.x is the output that some people desire. A significant number of > people, including me, would prefer to stick with the current > three-part versioning scheme, possibly with some change to the > algorithm for bumping the first digit (e.g. every 5 years like > clockwork). > > I was speaking for the project/community as a distinct entity and not about any individual contributor. I'm acting as if we're past the point of individual opinions and votes on the decision to go to a two-part versioning scheme. We will still welcome any major revelations that may have gone unconsidered during the decision making but I find that to be unlikely. David J.