Andres Freund <> writes:
> On 2016-06-30 10:14:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <> writes:
>>> As far as I read the code of the function, those arguments don't seem to
>>> be necessary. So I'm afraid that the pg_proc entry for the function might
>>> be incorrect and those two arguments should be removed from the definition.

>> Sure looks that way from here.  Copy-and-paste from the previous
>> line in pg_proc.h, perhaps?

> Yes, that's clearly wrong. Damn.  Can't fix that for 9.5 anymore. The
> function isn't all that important (especially not from SQL), but still,
> that's annoying.  I'm inclined to just remove the args in 9.6. We could
> also add a note to the 9.5 docs, adding that the arguments are there by
> error?

Yeah, seems like the best thing to do.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to