El 2/7/2016 20:33, "Euler Taveira" <eu...@timbira.com.br> escribió:
> On 02-07-2016 22:04, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> > The attached patch adds a new function "to_date_valid()" which will
> > validate the date and return an error if the input and output date do
> > not match. Tests included, documentation update as well.
> >
> Why don't you add a third parameter (say, validate = true | false)
> instead of creating another function? The new parameter could default to
> false to not break compatibility.

Shouldn't we fix this instead? Sounds like a bug to me. We don't usually
want to be bug compatible so it doesn't matter if we break something.

Jaime Casanova                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to