* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > On 2016-07-11 11:14:29 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > >> Or in short, this may be a fine change to make, but I don't like your > > >> argument for it. > > > > > > I don't agree that it's sensible to get rid of. Having just > > > log_checkpoints will have the logs filled with checkpoints starting > > > because of XLOG, but there's no indication of that being a bad thing. > > > > I agree. checkpoint_warning exists for the benefit of novice DBAs. > > I've seen those warnings in customer logs on several occasions, at > > least back when I was a consultant. > > Note that the situation changed a bit with 9.5, because our defaults > aren't absurdly conservative (checkpoint_segments = 3) anymore.
Agreed, but I don't think that means we'll never see that warning again.. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature