Patrick Macdonald wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Someone at Red Hat is working on point-in-time recovery, also known as > > incremental backups. > > PITR and incremental backup are different beasts. PITR deals with a backup > + logs. Incremental backup deals with a full backup + X smaller/incremental > backups. > > So... it doesn't look like anyone is working on incremental backup at the > moment.
But why would someone want incremental backups compared to PITR? The backup would be mixture of INSERTS, UPDATES, and DELETES, right? Seems pretty weird. :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
