On 7/13/16 12:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Blackwell <mike.blackw...@rrd.com> writes:
There are times when it would be useful to have the application_name
connection parameter displayed in the process name - and thus in ps and
pg_top - in addition to the user and database name.
Would there be any downside to this?
In a lot of situations ("top" for instance) only a limited number of
characters can be displayed from a process title. I'm hesitant to add
fields to that string that we don't really need.
Could we make this configurable, similar to log_line_prefix?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
