On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The concern I've got about this proposal is that the results get very > questionable as soon as we start dropping statement entries for lack > of space. last_executed would be okay, perhaps, but first_executed > not so much.
Agreed. Also, for what it's worth, I should point out to Jun that GetCurrentTimestamp() should definitely not be called when a spinlock is held like that. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
