On 2016-07-19 14:18:22 +0300, amatv...@bitec.ru wrote:
> > Using TLS will slow down things noticeably though. So if we were to go
> > there, we'd have to make up for some constant slowdown.
> I can not understand why?
> I've read
> The results are quite straightforward: no overhead at all.
> 0x0000000000404f40 <+0>: inc DWORD PTR [rip+0x202382]
> 0x0000000000404f50 <+0>: inc DWORD PTR fs:0xfffffffffffffffc
Not really true IIRC. For one segment offset stuff is encoded more
widely, and for another, it'll generate more uops in many
microarchitectures. Also, we actually *do* qualify for the exception in
the blog you linked above: We have a fair amount of dynamically linked
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: