Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK, after hacking that for a bit I have finished with option 2 and the > > set of PG-like set of routines, the use of USE_SSL in the file > > containing all the SHA functions of OpenBSD has proved to be really > > ugly, but with a split things are really clear to the eye. The stuff I > > got builds on OSX, Linux and MSVC. pgcrypto cannot link directly to > > libpgcommon.a, so I am making it compile directly with the source > > files, as it is doing on HEAD. > > Btw, attached is the patch I did for this part if there is any interest in it.
After quickly eyeballing your patch, I agree with the decision of going with (2), even if my gut initially told me that (1) would be better because it'd require less makefile trickery. I'm surprised that you say pgcrypto cannot link libpgcommon directly. Is there some insurmountable problem there? I notice your MSVC patch uses libpgcommon while the Makefile symlinks the files. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers