>>>>> "David" == David G Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Prohibiting IS NOT NULL is not on the cards; it's very widely used. David> Yet changing how it behaves, invisibly, is? Did you mean prohibiting it only for composite-type args? It's obviously widely used for non-composite args. I would expect that >95% of cases where someone has written (x IS NOT NULL) for x being a composite type, it's actually a bug and that NOT (x IS NULL) was intended. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
