On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ah, yes, and that's a stupid mistake. We had better use >> replay_location instead of write_location. There is a risk that >> records have not been replayed yet even if they have been written on >> the standby, so it is possible that the query looking at tab_int may >> not see this relation. > > Or in short, the attached fixes 2) and will help providing input for 1)..
Increasing the timeout had zero effect for test 003: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hamster&dt=2016-07-26%2016%3A00%3A07 So we're facing something else. I'll dig into that deeper using manually hamster. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers