I wrote: > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> Any work in this area is likely 10.0 material at this point.
> I'm not really happy with that, since refactoring it again will create > back-patch hazards. But I see that a lot of the mess here was created > in 9.5, which means we're probably stuck with back-patch hazards anyway. I've pushed Kyotaro-san's original patch, which is clearly a bug fix. I think the additional changes discussed later in this thread are cosmetic, and probably should wait for a more general review of the layering decisions in pqcomm.c. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers