Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Here are two WIP patches to improve the DefElem list processing that is
> used by many utility commands.
> One factors out the duplicate checks, which are currently taking up a
> lot of space with duplicate code. I haven't applied this everywhere
> yet, but the patch shows how much boring code can be saved.
+1 on the general idea, but I wonder if it's a problem that you replaced
an O(N) check with an O(N^2) check. I don't think there are any commands
that would be likely to have so many options that this would become a
serious issue, but ...
> The other adds a location field to the DefElem node.
+1 for sure, lots of places where that would be a good thing
(the duplicate check itself, for starters).
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: