On 7/3/16 11:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I can see the reasoning for > allowing COMMENT in a table column definition, but the argument for > allowing it in simpler CREATEs seems tissue-thin: > > CREATE FUNCTION foo(int) RETURNS ... ; > COMMENT ON FUNCTION foo(int) IS 'blah'; > > vs > > CREATE FUNCTION foo(int) RETURNS ... > WITH (COMMENT 'blah'); > > Not much of a keystroke savings, nor is the comment noticeably > "closer" to its object than before.
I had actually been thinking about a similar proposal, but specifically for CREATE FUNCTION. But the syntax would have to put it above the function body, not below it. I think the CREATE FUNCTION syntax could actually handle that. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
