Jeff Janes <> writes:
> I have it PGC_SUSET because it does send some tiny amount of
> information about the blocking process (the PID) to the blocked
> process.  That is probably too paranoid, because the PID can be seen
> by anyone in the pg_locks table anyway.

Why not just leave out the PID?  I think it's often far too simplistic
to blame a lock wait on a single other process, anyway.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to