Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-08-05 16:35:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> In particular, it seems to me that rather than implement just this, >> we really ought to provide an API that lets FDWs actually implement >> TRUNCATE if they feel like it. Having the trigger and not TRUNCATE >> capability itself just screams "half baked", wouldn't you say?
> Both is fine with me. I do object to the position that we need an answer > for all utility commands - that seems like a too high hurdle to pass - > but implementing truncate for FDWs directly sounds good. To clarify: I was certainly not suggesting that we need to implement more than that in the first go. I was just saying that some sort of long-term roadmap about utility commands for FDWs would be a good idea. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers