Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> I was looking at this TODO item from 2009:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4AA7B197.70002%40usit.uio.no
> I have implemented this in the attached patch. It does two things:
Is there really enough demand for this to justify subtle breakage
of existing pg_hba.conf entries? It'd probably have been fine if
we did it like that originally, but I think it's a bit late now.
Also, why strcasecmp and not pg_strcasecmp? The former is going
to induce misbehavior in e.g. Turkish locales.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
