> Tatsuo>understanding it always uses unnamed portal even if the SQL is like > "BEGIN" or "COMMIT" (no parameters). They are too often used. Why not > doing like this? > > Does it actually work? > > The documentation says named portals last till the end of the transaction: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/protocol-flow.html#PROTOCOL-FLOW-EXT-QUERY > > > doc>If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of > the current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed
Oh, ok. I misunderstood that named portals survive beyond transaction boundary. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
