Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:42:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The mechanism I described in the above-referenced message only occurs
>> for nailed-in-cache system tables.  Given Daniels' report (and one or

> And for ones that have been truncated?  I found this reference:


Sigh, I must be losing brain cells faster than I thought.  I completely
forgot about the TRUNCATE version of the problem.

Of course, if the complainant hasn't done TRUNCATE either, then we may
still have an issue ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to