On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Added to TODO: > > * Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata >... > > Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position speeds up the > > recovery process, but to handle possible corruption of pg_control, > > we should actually implement the reading of existing log segments > > in reverse order -- newest to oldest -- in order to find the last > > checkpoint. This has not been implemented, yet.
So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in pg_control at all? cjs -- Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
