On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Added to TODO:
>       * Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata
> >      Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position speeds up the
> >      recovery process, but to handle possible corruption of pg_control,
> >      we should actually implement the reading of existing log segments
> >      in reverse order -- newest to oldest -- in order to find the last
> >      checkpoint. This has not been implemented, yet.

So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in
pg_control at all?

Curt Sampson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to