On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Yury Zhuravlev
<u.zhurav...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Hello hackers.
>
> I have a small question. While working on an incremental backup I noticed a
> strange thing.
> Newly created index is contains the invalid LSN (0/0).
> Exmaple:
> postgres=# select lsn from page_header(get_raw_page('test_a_idx2',0));
> lsn -----
> 0/0
> (1 row)
>
> Can you explain me why?
>For some of the indexes like btree which are built outside shared buffers, we don't write WAL unless wal_level >= REPLICA. I think Robert has explained it very well how we handle the crash recovery situation for such indexes. However, for some other indexes which don't bypass shared buffers like BRIN, GIN we do write WAL for such cases as well, so you must see LSN for those type of indexes. I am less sure, if there will be any problem, if don't write WAL for those indexes as well when wal_level < REPLICA. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
