On 2016-08-30 11:22:43 +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 2016-08-29 18:22:56 +0300, maksim wrote:
> > > Now I complete extension that provides facility to see the current state
> > > of
> > > query execution working on external session in form of EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> > > output. This extension works on 9.5 version, for 9.6 and later it doesn't
> > > support detailed statistics for parallel nodes yet.
> > Could you expand a bit on what you want this for exactly?
> Max goal - to push my extension to postgres core. But now it's ready only
> for 9.5. Prerequisites of this extension are patches presented here.
I'm asking what you want this for. "An extension" isn't a detailed
> > > 2. Patch that enables to interrupt the query executor
> > > (executor_hooks.patch).
> > > This patch enables to hang up hooks on executor function of each node
> > > (ExecProcNode). I define hooks before any node execution and after
> > > execution.
> > > I use this patch to add possibility of query tracing by emitted rows from
> > > any node. I interrupt query executor after any node delivers one or zero
> > > rows to upper node. And after execution of specific number trace steps I
> > > can
> > > get the query state of traceable backend which will be somewhat
> > > deterministic. I use this possibility for regression tests of my
> > > extension.
> > This will increase executor overhead.
> In simple case we have checks on existence of hooks.
That *is* noticeable.
> > I think we'll need to find a way
> > to hide this behind the existing if (instrument) branches.
> And so can be. It doesn't matter for trace mode. But I think instrument
> branch is intended only for collecting statistics by nodes.
I can't follow here. That's all what analyze is about?
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: