Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hmm, comparing gin_desc() to ginRedoInsert() makes me think there are more >> problems there than that one. Aren't the references to "payload" wrong >> in all three branches of that "if" construct, not just the middle one?
> If we do this, the extra information like ginxlogInsertEntry->isDelete will > never be reported when the record has FPW. I'm happy to have it print whatever is there, but are you sure that the information is even there? I thought that this chunk of the WAL record would get optimized away if we write an FPW image instead. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers